In the course on Philosophy of Logic by Dr. A. Marra I submit the linked essay together with What a Logic Could not Be
The essay is available at: Overleaf.
Abstract
After some observations on the application of Tarskian Semantic to empirical statements, I argue for the equality of the interpretational and representational account. I start by showing an intuitive way to apply Tarskian Semantics to empirical statements by using some arguments in the Philosophy of Science, I then show how Tarskian Semantics requires a weak form of scientific structuralism. Finally I conclude by showing how scientific structuralism does not allow a proper distinction of interpretational and representational account.